Publications
Found 16 results
Author Title Type [ Year] Filters: First Letter Of Last Name is V [Clear All Filters]
The connections—and misconnections—between the public and politicians over climate policy: A social psychological perspective.
Social Issues and Policy Review.
(2024). Party over pandemic: Trust in political leaders and experts explains public support for COVID-19 policies.
Group Processes & Intergroup Relations.
(2023). Politicians polarize and experts depolarize public support for COVID-19 management policies across countries.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
(2022). Politicians polarize and experts depolarize public support for COVID-19 management policies across countries.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
(2022). Social norms explain prioritization of climate policy.
Climatic Change.
(2022).
(2022).
(2022). Elite influence on public attitudes about climate policy.
Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences.
(2021).
(2021).
(2021). It depends: Partisan evaluation of conditional probability importance.
Cognition. 188, 51 - 63.
(2019). Partisan barriers to bipartisanship: Understanding climate policy.
Social Psychological and Personality Science.
(2018). Psychological barriers to bipartisan public support for climate policy.
Perspectives on Psychological Sciences.
(2018). Towards surmounting the psychological barriers to climate policy: Appreciating contexts and acknowledging challenges (comment on Weber, 2018).
Perspectives on Psychological Sciences.
(2018). In the aftermath of terrorism: Effects of self- versus group-affirmation on support for discriminatory policies.
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology .
(2017). Political polarization projection: social projection of partisan attitude extremity and attitudinal processes.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 103, 84.
(2012).