Publications

Found 16 results
Author Title [ Type(Desc)] Year
Filters: First Letter Of Last Name is V  [Clear All Filters]
Journal Article
Sherman, D. K., & Van Boven L. (2024).  The connections—and misconnections—between the public and politicians over climate policy: A social psychological perspective. Social Issues and Policy Review.
Van Boven, L., & Sherman D. K. (2021).  Elite influence on public attitudes about climate policy. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences.
Sherman, D.K., Shteyn M.F., Han H., & Van Boven L. (2021).  The exchange between citizens and elected officials: A social psychological framework for citizen climate activists. Behavioural Public Policy.
Badea, C., Binning K.R., Verlhiac J., & Sherman D.K. (2017).  In the aftermath of terrorism: Effects of self- versus group-affirmation on support for discriminatory policies. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology .
Van Boven, L., Ramos J., Montal-Rosenberg R., Kogut T., Sherman D.K., & Slovic P. (2019).  It depends: Partisan evaluation of conditional probability importance. Cognition. 188, 51 - 63.
Ehret, P.J., Sherman D.K., & Van Boven L. (2018).  Partisan barriers to bipartisanship: Understanding climate policy. Social Psychological and Personality Science.
Cole, J. C., Flores A., Jiga-Boy G. M., Klein O., Sherman D. K., & Van Boven L. (2023).  Party over pandemic: Trust in political leaders and experts explains public support for COVID-19 policies. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations.
Van Boven, L., Judd C. M., & Sherman D. K. (2012).  Political polarization projection: social projection of partisan attitude extremity and attitudinal processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 103, 84.
Flores, A., Cole J. C., Dickert S., Eom K., Jiga-Boy G. M., Kogut T., et al. (2022).  Politicians polarize and experts depolarize public support for COVID-19 management policies across countries. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
Flores, A., Cole J. C., Dickert S., Eom K., Jiga-Boy G. M., Kogut T., et al. (2022).  Politicians polarize and experts depolarize public support for COVID-19 management policies across countries. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
Van Boven, L., Ehret P.J., & Sherman D.K. (2018).  Psychological barriers to bipartisan public support for climate policy. Perspectives on Psychological Sciences.
Cole, J. C., Ehret P. J., Sherman D. K., & Van Boven L. (2022).  Social norms explain prioritization of climate policy. Climatic Change.
Ramos, J., Grant M., Dickert S., Eom K., Flores A., Jiga-Boy G. M., et al. (2022).  Structured reflection increases intentions to reduce other people’s health risks during COVID-19. PNAS Nexus.
Ramos, J., Grant M., Dickert S., Eom K., Flores A., Jiga-Boy G. M., et al. (2022).  Structured reflection increases intentions to reduce other people’s health risks during COVID-19. PNAS Nexus.
Van Boven, L., Ehret P.J., & Sherman D.K. (2018).  Towards surmounting the psychological barriers to climate policy: Appreciating contexts and acknowledging challenges (comment on Weber, 2018). Perspectives on Psychological Sciences.
Grant, M., Flores A., Pedersen E., Sherman D. K., & Van Boven L. (2021).  When election expectations fail: Polarized perceptions of election legitimacy increase with accumulating evidence of election outcomes and with polarized media. PLoSONE.