Psychology 594JR Syllabus: Evolutionary Perspectives on Human Mating

Winter, 2005

Prof. Jim Roney (roney@psych.ucsb.edu)

Class: Wednesdays, 4:00-6:00pm, Psych 1523

Office Hours: Thursdays, 9:30-11:30 AM, Psych 3243

Readings:

Most of the readings are from journals to which the UCSB library has an online subscription. These are designated “online journal” below and can be accessed via the MELVYL system. The remaining readings are on e-reserve: http://eres.library.ucsb.edu/.

Assignments and Grading:

Students will alternate leading discussion of specific readings. A brief summary of the readings should be sent to the impending class e-mail list by 1 PM on the day on which you are leading discussion. The summary should include: (1) a brief description of the main arguments/findings in the reading, (2) possible criticisms of the arguments or alternative explanations for the findings, and (3) a description of possible research studies that might test or extend the ideas presented in the reading. In addition, a brief paper will be assigned later in the quarter in which students will write a review of a research article related to one or more of the topics discussed in class. Grades will be based on both overall discussion performance (~60%) and on the written paper (~40%). Students who elect to take the class P/NP do not have to write the paper.

Week 1. January 5. Organizational Meeting.

Week 2. January 12. Theoretical Foundations: Sexual Selection.

Andersson, M. (1994). The theory of sexual selection. In Sexual selection (pp. 3-31). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. Campbell (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man (pp. 136-179). Chicago: Aldine.

Zahavi, A., & Zahavi, A. (1997). Mate selection. In The handicap principle (pp. 25-40). New York: Oxford University Press.

Week 3. January 19. Survey Research on Human Mate Preferences.

Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 1-49.

Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (1999). The origins of sex differences in human behavior: Evolved dispositions versus social roles. American Psychologist, 54, 408-423.  Online journal.

Li, N.P., Bailey, J. M., Kenrick, D. T., & Linsenmeier, J.A.W. (2002). The necessities and luxuries of mate preferences: Testing the tradeoffs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 947-955. Online journal.

Week 4. January 26. Neuroendocrinology of Mating Psychology.

Carter, C. S. (1992). Neuroendocrinology of sexual behavior in the female. In J. B. Becker, S. M. Breedlove, D. Crews (Eds.), Behavioral endocrinology (pp. 72-95). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Hamann, S., Herman, R. A., Nolan, C. L., & Wallen, K. (2004). Men and women differ in amygdala response to visual sexual stimuli. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 411-416. Online journal.

Roney, J. R., Mahler, S. V., & Maestripieri, D. (2003). Behavioral and hormonal responses of men to brief interactions with women. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24, 365-375. Online.

Sipos, M. L., & Nyby, J. G. (1996). Concurrent androgenic stimulation of the ventral tegmental area and medial preoptic area: synergistic effects on male-typical reproductive behaviors in house mice. Brain Research, 729, 29-44. Online journal.

Wallen, K. (2001). Sex and context: Hormones and primate sexual motivation. Hormones and Behavior, 40, 339-357. Online journal.

Wood, R. I. (1997). Thinking about networks in the control of male hamster sexual behavior. Hormones and Behavior, 32, 40-45. Online journal.

Week 5. February 2. Female Physical Attractiveness.

Ellison, P. T. (1994). Salivary steroids and natural variation in human ovarian function. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 709, 287-298.

Grammer, K., & Thornhill, R. (1994). Human (Homo sapiens) facial attractiveness and sexual selection: The role of symmetry and averageness. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 108, 233-242. Online journal.

Jasienska, G., Ziomkiewicz, A., Ellison, P. T., Lipson, S. F., & Thune, I. (2004). Large breasts and narrow waists indicate high reproductive potential in women. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 271, 1213-1217. Online journal.

Lipson, S. F., & Ellison, P. T. (1996). Comparison of salivary steroid profiles in naturally occurring conception and non-conception cycles. Human Reproduction, 11, 2090-2096.

Manning, J. T., Trivers, R. L., Singh, D., & Thornhill, R. (1999). The mystery of female beauty. Nature, 399, 214-216. (include replies by Tovee & Cornelissen, Yu & Shepard). Online.

Singh, D. (1993). Adaptive significance of female physical attractiveness: Role of waist-to-hip ratio. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 293-307. Online journal.

Yu, D. W., & Shepard, G. H. (1998). Is beauty in the eye of the beholder? Nature, 396, 321-322. Online.

Week 6. February 9. Male Physical Attractiveness.

Gangestad, S. W., Simpson, J. A., Cousins, A., Garver-Apgar, C. E., & Chistensen, P. N. (2004). Women’s preferences for men’s behavioral displays change across the menstrual cycle. Psychological Science, 15, 203-207. Online journal.

Gangestad, S. W., & Thornhill, R. (1998). Menstrual cycle variation in women’s preferences for the scent of symmetrical men. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 265, 927-933. Online

Maisey, D. S., Vale, E. E., Cornelissen, P. L., & Tovee, M. J. (1999). Characteristics of male attractiveness for women. Lancet, 353, 1500. Online journal.

Penton-Voak, I. S., et al. (1999). Menstrual cycle alters face preference. Nature, 399, 741-742. Online.

Penton-Voak, I. S., et al. (2001). Symmetry, sexual dimorphism in facial proportions and male facial attractiveness. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 268, 1617-1623. Online.

Perrett, D. I., et al. (1998). Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness. Nature, 394, 884-887. Online journal.

Swaddle, J. P., & Reierson, G. W. (2002). Testosterone increases perceived dominance but not attractiveness in human males. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 269, 2285-2289. Online journal.

Thornhill, R., Gangestad, S. W., & Comer, R. (1995). Human female orgasm and mate fluctuating asymmetry. Animal Behaviour, 50, 1601-1615. Online journal.

Week 7. February 16. Pheromones/Ovulation Detection.

Kuukasjarvi, S., Eriksson, P., Koskela, E., Mappes, T., Nissinen, K., & Rantala, M. J. (2004). Attractiveness of women’s body odors over the menstrual cycle: the role of oral contraceptives and receiver sex. Behavioral Ecology, 15, 579-584. Online.

McClintock, M. K. (1971). Menstrual synchrony and suppression. Nature, 229, 244-245.

Preti, G., Wysocki, C. J., Barnhart, K. T., Sondheimer, S. J., & Leyden, J. J. (2003). Male axillary extracts contain pheromones that affect pulsatile secretion of luteinizing hormone and mood in women recipients. Biology of Reproduction, 68, 2107-2113. Online journal.

Singh, D., & Bronstad, P. M. (2001). Female body odour is a potential cue to ovulation. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 268, 797-801. Online.

Wedekind, C., Seebeck, T., Bettens, F., & Paepke, A. J. (1995). MHC-dependent mate preferences in humans. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 260, 245-249. Online.

Wilson, H. C. (1992). A critical review of menstrual synchrony research. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 17, 565-591. Online.

Week 8. February 23. Jealousy.

Buss, D. M., Larsen, R. J., Westen, D., & Semmelroth, J. (1992). Sex differences in jealousy: Evolution, physiology, and psychology. Psychological Science, 3, 251-255. Online.

Buunk, B. P., Angleitner, A., Oubaid, V., & Buss, D. M. (1996). Sex differences in jealousy in evolutionary and cultural perspective: Tests from the Netherlands, Germany, and the United States. Psychological Science, 7, 359-363. Online.

DeSteno, D. A., & Salovey, P. (1996). Evolutionary origins of sex differences in jealousy? Questioning the “fitness” of the model. Psychological Science, 7, 367-372. Online.

Buss, D. M., Larsen, R. J., & Westen, D. (1996). Sex differences in jealousy: Not gone, not forgotten, and not explained by alternative hypotheses. Psychological Science, 7, 373-375. Online.

Buss, D. M., et al. (1999). Jealousy and the nature of beliefs about infidelity: Tests of competing hypotheses about sex differences in the United States, Korea, and Japan. Personal Relationships, 6, 125-150.

Harris, C. R. (2000). Psychophysiological responses to imagined infidelity: The specific innate modular view of jealousy reconsidered. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 1082-1091. Online.

DeSteno, D., Bartlett, M. Y., Salovey, P., & Braverman, J. (2002). Sex differences in jealousy: Evolutionary mechanism or artifact of measurement? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1103-1116. Online.

Week 9. March 2. Sperm Competition.

Baker, R. R., & Bellis, M. A. (1989). Number of sperm in human ejaculates varies in accordance with sperm competition theory. Animal Behaviour, 37, 867-869.

Baker, R. R., & Bellis, M. A. (1993). Human sperm competition: ejaculate adjustment by males and the function of masturbation. Animal Behaviour, 46, 861-885. Online.

Baker, R. R., & Bellis, M. A. (1993). Human sperm competition: ejaculate manipulation by females and a function for the female orgasm. Animal Behaviour, 46, 887-909. Online.

Birkhead, T. R. (2000). Excerpt from Promiscuity (pp. 21-29). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Shackelford, T. K., et al. (2002). Psychological adaptation to human sperm competition. Evolution and Human Behavior, 23, 123-138. Online.

Week 10. March 9. Prenatal Hormones and Sexual Orientation.

Bailey, J. M., Dunne, M. P., & Martin, N. G. (2000). Genetic and environmental influences on sexual orientation and its correlates in an Australian twin sample. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 524-536. Online.

Bem, D. J. (1996). Exotic becomes erotic: A developmental theory of sexual orientation. Psychological Review, 103, 320-335. Online.

Blanchard, R. (2001). Fraternal birth order and the maternal immune hypothesis of male homosexuality. Hormones and Behavior, 40, 105-114. Online.

Lippa, R. A. (2003). Are 2D:4D finger-length ratios related to sexual orientation? Yes for men, no for women. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 179-188. Online.